2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R

Pocket Rocket With a Gee Factor.

Type: Compact front-drive performance sedan.
MSRP: $20,525 - $22,880 (tested).
Engine: A 2.5-liter in-line 4-cylinder (200 horsepower, 180 pound-feet of torque); six-speed manual transmission.
Consumption: E.P.A. mileage estimate is 24 m.p.g. in town, 31 on the highway.
Alternatives: Honda Civic Si sedan ($21,685), Chevrolet Cobalt SS ($19,515), Hyundai Tiburon GT ($19,995), Mini Cooper S ($21,850).

Here is a car-marketing rule of thumb: the more letters and suffixes tacked onto a car name, the more gaudy accouterments — inside and out — the car will possess. So naturally you’d expect something called the 2007 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V to be pretty well endowed.

But the Spec V — let’s simply call it that — is surprisingly subdued in its excesses. Although it’s decked out with the requisite rear spoiler, bright red seat belts, and 17-inch aluminum alloy wheels, which have an awkward spoke pattern and look like stove-top gas burners, I felt relieved that things weren’t bigger, shinier and worse — with one exception.

A G meter sits front and center on the gray dashboard. It measures the G forces — how many times the force of gravity is pulling on your body. It also measures the extent to which Nissan has gone too far.

Not only is the Spec V a performance version of the Sentra, it is the performance version of the performance trim version — the SE-R — and sort of a pocket rocket squared.

The SE-R made its debut in 1991 as the Sentra’s top trim level. It came with a more powerful engine and was an instant underground hit with enthusiasts. For most of the decade, the SE-R was one of just a few performance-oriented compacts sequestered below the lackluster mainstream.

But then came the movie “The Fast and the Furious,” and automakers were suddenly made aware of a whole new market to exploit. In 2002, it was no longer enough to have just an SE-R. Nissan added a Spec V. In 2007, you needed a G meter.

I kept my eye on that G meter for the better part of five days of driving. Most of the time, the needle sat right on zero, but it wasn’t for the lack of trying. Oh, I tried. I pegged the car on on-ramps and off-ramps. I stopped short and started hard. The most I coaxed out of the Spec V was 0.1 g. Maybe it was broken. Maybe it is unnecessary.

Based on the sixth-generation Sentra, the Spec V is more powerful than the previous version. The 2.5-liter 4-cylinder engine returns 200 horsepower, which is 23 more than the SE-R and 60 more than the 2-liter 4 found in the regular Sentra. And the sound is beautiful, a smooth, graceful hum all the way up to the redline of 6,800 r.p.m.

The Spec V is available only with a close-ratio six-speed manual gearbox, which does the job without quirks or wobbles between gears. The electronic power steering feels direct, with a good amount of weight on surface streets, but on freeways the power assist seemed overdone.

You get the sense that all of the mechanical bits have been tweaked according to focus groups and research data to walk the delicate line between performance and comfort. The Spec V is definitely bigger and more spacious than ever. But it is also roughly 400 pounds heavier than the 2006 model. To stiffen the chassis, there is a larger front stabilizer bar and a V-brace behind the rear seats. A sport-tuned suspension and four-wheel disc brakes (including 12.6-inch rotors up front) also help the Spec V tuck in its weight. But all of that equipment fails to hide the bulk altogether.

The Spec V feels athletic but not chiseled. Road & Track clocked it at 6.6 seconds from a stop to 60 m.p.h., so its acceleration is better than ever. But the weight is the biggest factor in the overall feel of the car, which pales in comparison with the more enthusiastic pocket rockets of its ilk, like the Honda Civic Si and the Mini Cooper S.

And for a car with a name as long as the Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V, it is more of an everyday driver than you’d expect. It’s still sporty and fun, but it is likely to disappoint extremists, especially those in search of higher Gs.
(C)NYT

Top 10 Passenger Cars

The most popular passenger cars on MSN Autos, based on visits to the site's vehicle research pages.

Passenger cars have traditionally come in small, midsize or full-size but a new entry-level class was introduced recently when automakers began making more fuel-efficient subcompact cars. However, small and midsize cars continue to be the bread and butter of the segment and it's evident on MSN Autos' most popular passenger cars list.

Japanese imports lead the way with the Honda Civic taking the number one spot for the fourth consecutive quarter. The next three spots are taken up by three of the best-selling cars in America in 2006: the Nissan Altima, Toyota Camry and Honda Accord.

The lone bright spot for domestics is the always popular Ford Mustang. It ranks fifth on the list followed by the most recognizable hybrid on the road today, the Toyota Prius. In fact, Toyota is the only automaker with four vehicles in the top ten.

The most popular list consists of nine imports with eight coming from Japan and one from Germany. The top ten is also comprised of five midsize cars, four small cars and one subcompact.

The list of the ten most popular passenger cars on MSN Autos is based on visits to the site's vehicle research pages between April and June of 2007. Here is the complete list:

1. Honda Civic
Over the years, Honda has shown the Civic can take on the shape of a sedan, coupe and hatchback. There is no hatchback version for the eighth generation but there is a sedan version of the Si for the first time ever. Sharing the same characteristics as the 197-horsepower Si Coupe, the Si Sedan comes in a 6-speed manual transmission with helical-type limited slip differential, 17-inch alloy wheels and a rear spoiler. For consumers who don't need all that power, opt for the more efficient DX, LE or EX which can get about 30/38 mpg on city/hwy.

2. Nissan Altima
Nissan introduced a redesigned version of the Altima for 2007 with distinctive styling. Built smaller than its predecessor, the midsize sedan has a smaller wheelbase and is shorter in overall length but is about a half-inch wider. For the first time a coupe version of the Altima is available and joins the lineup for 2008. Based on the sedan, the Altima coupe is smaller, shorter and lighter than the sedan but it shares similar interior design and features. The Altima also comes in a hybrid but it is only available in eight states so far.

3. Toyota Camry
The best-selling car in America continues its dominance in 2007 with more than 240,000 units sold in the first half of the year. Toyota redesigned the Camry to give it a richer look, roomier interior and the most powerful V6 ever. On top of that, the first-ever gasoline-electric Camry Hybrid also debuted for 2007 featuring an estimated fuel economy rating of 40 mpg in the city and 38 on the highway. The Camry is available in four trim levels—CE, LE, SE and XLE—and prices start at under $19,000 for the base CE with a 4-cylinder engine and manual transmission.

4. Honda Accord
Not long ago Honda held the top spot in U.S. car sales. Now the automaker is trying to regain that crown via the Accord, which was revamped in the 2006 model year. According to Automotive News, the Accord is third in passenger car sales in the first half of 2007. Available in a coupe or a sedan, the midsize car is fun to drive and comes with a laundry list of safety features. Although it's popular among families, Honda says the V6 sedan with a 6-speed manual is "designed to appeal to driving enthusiasts." The gasoline-electric hybrid is still available for 2007 but Honda has announced it will not produce it for 2008.

5. Ford Mustang
Ford's Mustang was given the retro look back in the 2005 model year. Its popularity has not waned and consumers have continued to give it a thumbs up by making it the most popular sports car on MSN Autos for six straight quarters. Available in a coupe or convertible, shoppers can also choose between a 210-horsepower V6 or a 300-horsepower V8. The convertible is more rigidly built than any pre-2005 Mustang convertibles with virtually no cowl shake. Affordability has kept the Mustang an attainable sports car with a starting price of under $20,000.

6. Toyota Prius
The most popular hybrid on MSN Autos also makes the top ten passenger cars list as well. Known for its great fuel economy, the Prius has become a mainstream vehicle since its introduction in 2000. One of Consumer Reports' Top Picks of 2007, the Prius is the most fuel-efficient vehicle in America with estimated 2008 EPA ratings at 48 mpg in the city and 45 mpg on the highway. Consumer Reports also gave the hybrid the best depreciating rating because of the ongoing demand and excellent reliability.

7. Toyota Corolla
It seems that Toyota's formula to keeping the Corolla a success is rather simple: Don't change it. The Corolla has consistently been a best-selling car in America without any major changes for the past few years. Fuel economy is one of the reasons for its popularity and having a good reputation as a reliable car doesn't hurt either. A Consumer Reports survey named the Corolla as one of 59 cars to make the Good Bets List and a top vehicle priced under $25,000 for 2007. Prices start at under $15,000 for a 2007 Corolla.

8. Toyota Yaris
A whole new entry-level segment of vehicles has emerged and Toyota is once again ahead of the game with the Yaris. Available in a sedan or a hatchback, the subcompact car has better fuel economy than any of its nonhybrid competitors with a starting price of just over $11,000. The Yaris is powered by a 106-horsepower 1.5-liter engine and provides decent 65-75 mph passing. Lots of shifting is required for best performance but buyers can opt for the automatic, which is smooth and responsive. The ride is supple and handling is OK if it's not pushed too hard especially with the base version that has 14-inch tires.

9. Volkswagen Jetta
The Jetta has grown in size over the years and this latest-generation version is the biggest one ever. Offered in a variety of trims, the Jetta comes with a 150-horsepower 2.5-liter engine or the more peppy 2.0-liter inline four turbocharged engine that produces 200 horsepower and 207 lb-ft of torque. Volkswagen has been showing a number of commercials touting its vehicles' safety. The Jetta comes with a number of safety features including anti-lock brakes, traction control, front-seat side airbags and head-curtain airbags. The Jetta also gets four stars out of five from the NHTSA in the frontal crash test and five stars in the side crash test.

10. Nissan Maxima
Nissan's flagship car got a facelift for the 2007 model year featuring a new grille, hood, bumpers and headlights. One of the new features is the Nissan Xtronic CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) which is designed to be more fuel-efficient than the traditional automatic transmission. The 255-horsepower V6 is quite potent but it produces a bit of torque steer. Automotive consulting firm Strategic Vision awarded the Maxima as a top medium car (tied with Saturn Aura) in the 2007 Total Quality Index (TQI). The survey is based on responses from more than 27,000 buyers who bought 2007 models in September, October and November of 2006.
(C)MSN

Top 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles

Here are the 20 most dangerous vehicles according to 'real world safety' from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Hoping to stay safe on the road? You might want to avoid certain cars.

For example, the Nissan 350Z has a death rate that's about double that of the average sports car.

But it's not for the reasons you might think. In this case, says Russ Rader, communications director for the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an organization that represents the interests of the insurance industry, the 350Z is part of a group of vehicles that tends to be driven by younger, less-experienced or riskier drivers, and stands out for having high death rates, through no particular fault of the car.

"When they are in crashes," he adds, "they're particularly serious ones."

This illustrates a key point: Simply looking at the historical death rates for one particular model might not give much insight into the relative danger, or safety, of driving that vehicle. Furthermore, the most recent available federal data, interpreted by make and model by the IIHS, covers 2001 to 2004 model years in calendar years 2002 to 2005. Many models have had significant changes in safety equipment or complete redesigns since then.

The consensus among several safety experts we asked is that the best way to predict how dangerous or safe a new vehicle will be comes from looking at the way it's configured, particularly with respect to several important factors — side-impact protection, stability control and rollover risk — that together span a wide range in real-world safety.

That's what we did. Topping the list of the least safe: the Buick Rendezvous, the Ford Ranger/Mazda B-Series, the Nissan Frontier, the Ford Escape/Mercury Mariner and the Toyota Yaris.

High-Priority Protection
Among the various crash tests the IIHS performs on new vehicles, according to Rader, they see the widest range of results in those with side-impact and rear whiplash protection.

"What makes a vehicle unsafe today is a lack of side-impact protection," he says. "Whiplash is not a life-threatening injury, but head injuries [from a side impact] are commonly life-threatening."

Side-curtain airbags have been shown to greatly increase the chances of surviving a classic "T-bone" side-impact accident, such as when the other vehicle runs a stoplight, and depending on the design, they can also increase the chances of surviving a rollover. Side-curtain bags are mandated for all 2009 vehicles, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that these alone will reduce fatal side-impact head injuries by 45 percent, saving up to 1,000 lives per year.

"Side airbags designed to protect your head are crucial, because a head injury is the most common fatal injury in a crash," says Rader. "It's the difference between life and death."

Structurally Sound
Along with side airbags, a vehicle also needs a well-built side structure to withstand a strong blow from vehicles of varying heights, says Rader.

Which leads to another major point: "Size and weight are very important aspects of safety," he says. "The laws of physics always apply in a crash. That means that people in smaller and lighter vehicles are always at a disadvantage in crashes with other vehicles."

In single-vehicle crashes, the weight advantage isn't as pronounced, but the statistics still point in favor of larger, if not heavier vehicles, he says.

However, John Linkov, managing editor of Consumer Reports, says that smaller and lighter vehicles aren't necessarily more dangerous. In many cases, they may offer handling and maneuverability advantages to help avoid accidents.

"A more nimble, better-handling vehicle," he says, "is likely going to be easier to control in an emergency and help the driver avoid the dangerous situation."

While generally heavier SUVs and pickups are at an advantage in multi-vehicle accidents, they've been shown to be at quite a disadvantage in single-vehicle accidents (such as when the driver falls asleep, or loses control swerving around a deer), which comprise 43 percent of fatal accidents.

In this type of accident, SUVs and pickups have more than double the chance of rolling over, according to NHTSA data. This risk relates closely to overall federal fatality data, showing that SUVs and pickups generally have a higher fatality rate than cars of a similar weight.

Corrective Measures
Electronic stability control systems, which smartly apply the brakes on one or more of the wheels as best to avoid loss of vehicle control in an extreme maneuver, have been offered for more than a decade in some luxury and high-performance vehicles, but the technology has been trickling down to most mainline brands over the past several model years.

NHTSA has called it the most significant development since the seat belt, and the federal government has mandated electronic stability control, but not until the 2012 model year. NHTSA estimates that the stability control mandate will prevent up to 9,600 fatalities and 238,000 injuries annually, at an average cost of $111 per vehicle in addition to the cost of antilock brakes, which most vehicles already offer as standard equipment or as an option.

"Electronic stability control is one of those rare safety features that's having a dramatic effect on saving lives," says Rader. "Stability control alone can reduce the risk of fatal single-vehicle crashes by 56 percent. And it can reduce fatal single-vehicle rollovers by 80 percent for SUVs, 77 percent for passenger cars."

Even though stability control was only offered in some of the more expensive SUVs a few years ago, Rader says that its impact is already easily seen in the Institute's yearly list of vehicles with the lowest death rates. Rader said that in the past, only a few of them were SUVs, but now they make up nearly half of the list.

Terrifying Trucks
Pickups are another surprisingly unsafe group of vehicles. Based on fatality-rate data, they're by far the most dangerous, says Michael Dulberger, president of the safety advocacy group Informed for Life.

"Pickups as a class have the highest rate of fatality and serious injury," he says, "and they have a very high rollover risk."

Rader agrees. "Pickups have a rollover problem," he says. "They have a high center of gravity and a high propensity to roll over." And making matters worse, "They're the laggards in electronic stability control," he says.

Last year, only one pickup model offered electronic stability control, according to Rader, while this year it's standard on 8 percent of models and optional on 20 percent. By comparison, 87 percent of SUVs now have standard stability control, according to the Institute.

Linkov agrees that some pickups pose the most danger to inexperienced drivers. "What we're seeing is that young people in places where pickups are a de facto choice are at an especially strong risk, with their propensity to roll over," he says.

Any vehicle can be especially unsafe if it's used in a way it's not designed for, such as if a high-clearance pickup is used primarily empty on curvy, hilly roads, according to Linkov.

"Combine that with a poorly trained driver," he says, "and it's dangerous."

The Methodology
As we've outlined, generalized fatality statistics point toward today's most dangerous new vehicles as those that are light, don't provide proper side-impact protection (airbags), have a higher propensity to roll over, don't handle particularly well and lack electronic stability control.

Informed for Life releases SCORE (Statistical Combination of Risk Elements) data each year, which combines all the available safety data from the federal government and the IIHS, along with the role of weight and the presence of stability control, into a single number for each particular model, making it easier to compare vehicles of varying sizes or body types.

The SCORE is calculated according to the role that each element plays in general fatal accidents. For instance, as about 26 percent of national accident fatalities occur in a side impact, 26 percent of the SCORE depends on the vehicle's rated side-impact protection.

The system, which has been implemented for about five years, more closely matches the fatality rate on a model-by-model basis than either IIHS or NHTSA ratings alone. And it's easy to decipher; it's on a scale that's proportional to risk, with the average passenger car ranked 100.

So, for instance, a SCORE of 150 means that the relative risk of driver fatality is 50 percent higher than for the average passenger car. In the group's 2007 list, the most dangerous vehicle, the Buick Rendezvous, at 161, has more than three times the relative risk of fatality than the Hyundai Entourage and Kia Sedona minivans, at 51.

To distill our list of the most dangerous vehicles, we looked at Informed for Life's bottom-of-the-heap results for 2007 model-year vehicles, including vehicles with a full range of crash-test results from NHTSA, the IIHS, or a combination of the two; and to also consider the role of accident avoidance (or lack thereof), we broke any ties with Consumer Reports' accident avoidance scores.

CR first measures the vehicle's maximum stable speed through emergency handling, essentially simulating a quick swerve around an obstacle and back into the right lane, then factors in driving position, visibility and seat comfort — all issues that the organization deems important in successfully avoiding an accident.

We're aware that this is a snapshot of the most dangerous cars among those that have been extensively tested, and that there may be more dangerous vehicles that either haven't yet been fully crash-tested or were only partially tested. Please consult www.safercar.gov or www.iihs.org if you're concerned about a particular model.

How Carmakers Reacted
Automakers were generally supportive of a methodology that looked for the safest — or in this case, the least safe — vehicles through a composite assessment of existing crash-test results, and considering side-impact protection and rollover likelihood, instead of looking at prior model-by-model fatality or injury data.

GM
Alan Adler, GM's safety spokesman, confirms that it's important to look at a wide range of information. "You've identified two technologies [side airbags and stability control] that are important, and we have rollout plans for both," says Adler.

More than 40 percent of GM's light trucks now have side-curtain airbags that allow head protection even in rollovers. Stability control is offered in 35 percent of GM vehicles for 2007, and the percentage rises to about 50 percent for 2008, according to Adler. Regarding SUVs and pickups, Adler says that "rollover is a big deal" to the company, which now does its own rollover safety testing.

To shoppers who might wonder why stability control isn't yet installed in more vehicles, GM's Adler says, "It isn't something you can slap on a vehicle," and explains that the automaker has been working to install it across the board ever since the agencies have revealed its importance. "It's a major engineering change to the vehicle."

Toyota
Toyota spokesman Bill Kwong questions the correlation between weight and safety; he says that Toyota has been incorporating more high-strength steel, which improves crash resistance yet saves weight, though again, at a higher cost to the automaker.

Kwong said that side-impact airbags are now available on all Toyota cars. They're optional on the Corolla, along with the Yaris and Matrix, two cars that ranked among the least-safe vehicles, according to our methodology, without the option.

"Those models are more price sensitive," especially the Yaris, which is why the side bags are optional, according to Kwong. He adds that dealerships are told to inform shoppers of the benefits of the Yaris's side airbag system.

Ford
Several Ford Motor vehicles were on our Most Dangerous list, but the company's safety spokesman, Daniel Jarvis, explains that these are all products near the end of their life cycle and not representative of the rest of Ford's model lineup.

Jarvis said the company places a strong emphasis on safety. Several of the vehicles that place highest in crash tests are from Ford, and the company has aggressive programs in place to install side airbags and stability control across its entire fleet.

"By the end of calendar year 2009, all retail vehicles will have stability control," says Jarvis; that would be nearly three years ahead of the federal mandate. Ford has also made an enhanced version, called Roll Stability Control, aimed to prevent the likelihood of rollover, standard on its larger Expedition and Explorer SUVs, and the company is adding the system to the smaller Escape sport-utility for the '08 model year.

Jarvis suggests there are a number of reasons why pickups have been among the last to get stability control, but one is that they come in such a wide range of powertrains and configurations, and each one of them needs to be engineered individually. "Complexity is one factor," he says.

Nissan
"Nissan has not had the opportunity to fully understand the methodology that went into this listing," says Jeannine Ginivan, a spokeswoman for Nissan. "That being said, Nissan takes its commitment to safety very seriously.

"All Nissan and Infiniti vehicles are engineered to meet or exceed government safety regulations as well as our own rigorous internal safety requirements — the Nissan Xterra and the Nissan Frontier are no exceptions. Nissan's electronic stability control feature, known as Vehicle Dynamic Control, is standard on the Xterra and currently an option on the Frontier. Rollover curtain airbags are also optional on both vehicles.

"As a company, we are committed to the safety of our vehicles and our drivers, and we urge everyone driving a Nissan or Infiniti vehicle to do so safely."

Suzuki
"At Suzuki, we place the utmost priority on manufacturing and selling safe vehicles, and both Forenza and Reno comply with all federal motor-vehicle safety standards," says David Boldt, communications manager. "Additionally, like all 2007 Suzuki passenger cars, the Forenza and Reno offer front-seat-mounted side airbags for both driver and passenger, as well as several layers of standard safety equipment.

"It's also important to note the active safety benefits provided by Forenza and Reno, with composed handling (four-wheel independent suspension), precise steering and four-wheel disc braking. Add excellent outward visibility for driver and passengers, and Suzuki's approach is to help the driver avoid an accident before it occurs."

Honda, Hyundai and Kia did not return calls for comment.

1. Buick Rendezvous
Four-Door SUV
SCORE: 161
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: N/A

The minivan-based Rendezvous helped bring new customers to Buick dealerships, thanks to the Tiger Woods ad campaign behind it. But after the 2007 model year, the Rendezvous, with its abysmal three-star (out of five) NHTSA frontal impact rating, is history, to be replaced by the 2008 Buick Enclave, a crossover SUV with a full roster of standard safety equipment.

2. Ford Ranger/Mazda B-Series
Pickup, Regular Cab/Extended Cab: Four-Wheel Drive
SCORE: 153
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: N/A

The Ranger still follows a simple, proven design that's good for pickup buyers who really want to keep it basic and affordable. Unfortunately, side airbags or curtain bags aren't available, even as an option; neither is stability control. What's more, the Ranger (and the nearly identical B-Series) gets a low three-star NHTSA rollover rating, (which corresponds to a 20% to 30% risk of rollover in a single-vehicle crash) with one of the highest rollover risk factors (0.3) of any vehicle.

3. Nissan Frontier
Extended-Cab Pickup
SCORE: 145
ConsumerReports' accident avoidance: Average

Stability control is optional on the Frontier, and recommended considering its three-star NHTSA rollover rating. The King Cab Frontier has surprisingly low three-star NHTSA frontal crash-test ratings (most other pickups do quite well in the frontal tests), though a four-door Crew Cab Frontier was given a better four-star frontal rating. The Frontier was also rated "Poor" (out of good, acceptable, marginal or poor) by the IIHS in rear impact. Both Frontiers tested didn't have side airbags or side curtain bags, which are also optional.

4. Ford Escape/Mercury Mariner
Four-Door SUVs
SCORE: 138
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: N/A

Ford's small sport-utility vehicle, the Escape, and its cosmetically different sibling, the Mariner, were given an overall evaluation of "Poor" (the lowest possible rating) from the IIHS due to its lacking driver torso- and head-protection in the Institute's side-impact crash test (without the optional side airbag package). The federal government also gives the Mariner one of few three-star ratings, which corresponds to a relatively high risk of rollover. And stability control isn't available. Waiting for the '08 would be a smart move, as front side airbags, side curtain bags and stability control will all finally be standard.

5. Toyota Yaris
Four-Door
SCORE: 132
ConsumerReports' accident avoidance: Worse than average

Even though the Yaris has impressive fuel efficiency, a nicely designed interior, high expected reliability, and a number of other positive attributes, Consumer Reports' John Linkov says that the Yaris can't be recommended, "because its emergency handling is quite tail-happy and the driver could get out of control very quickly." And to make an especially dangerous combination, the Yaris four-door performs badly in both major side-crash tests, with three stars from NHTSA and a "Poor" rating from the IIHS.

6. Hyundai Accent
Four-Door
SCORE: 132
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The Accent tested near the bottom among all cars, according to IIHS crash testing, with the organization giving it a "Poor" rating in both side-impact and rear-impact tests, plus an unimpressive "Acceptable" frontal rating. And this is with standard side airbags. When the federal government tested an Accent four-door sedan, it rated its side-impact performance with three stars--the lowest it gets in 2007.

7. Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe
Four-Door
SCORE: 131
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The Matrix and the closely related Vibe fair acceptably with four- and five-star results in the federal government's crash tests. But without the optional side airbags, the Matrix gets only three stars for front-seat passengers in the side-impact test. Stability control is optional on both models, which are due to be replaced by a new model after '08.

8. Kia Rio
Four-Door
SCORE: 127
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Better than average

The Rio is structurally similar to the Hyundai Accent. And like the Accent, it gets a low, three-star NHTSA side impact rating, plus appalling "Poor" ratings in both side- and rear-impact tests and the not-quite-passable "Acceptable" frontal rating from the IIHS. Surprisingly, those results are with the standard side airbags. Fortunately, the Rio has "better than average" accident avoidance qualities, according to Consumer Reports testing.

9. Chevrolet Aveo
Four-Door
SCORE: 126
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The basic, lightweight Aveo, which is assembled in Korea by GM affiliate Daewoo, is the lowest-priced U.S.-market vehicle, starting at $9,995 for 2007. Side airbags are standard for front passengers, but not in back, and by the three-star side-impact result for rear-seat passengers and the "Marginal" side-impact result from the IIHS, occupants might not fare so well in a side-impact accident.

10. Suzuki Reno/Forenza
Five-Door/ Five-Door
SCORE: 125
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The Reno and Forenza, a four-door hatchback and sedan, respectively, are also made by GM-Daewoo in Korea. Both come with standard front seat-mounted side airbags, but that doesn't seem to help them in IIHS side-impact tests, where they get "Poor" ratings in side impact, as well as rear impact. Side curtain airbags and stability control aren't available in either the Reno or Forenza.

11. Ford Focus
Two-Door Hatchback
SCORE: 124
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The economical Focus received a "Poor" rating from the IIHS in its side impact test, and in federal tests it achieved only a three-star rating, with an accompanying warning regarding the high likelihood of head trauma. Compiling the risk, side-curtain airbags and stability control aren't available on the Focus, and seat-mounted side airbags are optional for front occupants.

12. Jeep Liberty
Four-Door SUV
SCORE: 118
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The Jeep Liberty maneuvers much better in real-world driving than its height might suggest, and the "Average" CR accident avoidance score is reassuring. Yet it's also given just three stars in the federal rollover rating system. Additionally, in IIHS tests, the Liberty didn't fare so well, with a "Poor" rating in rear impact and a "Marginal" rating in front impact, together corresponding to a significantly higher chance of injuries if an accident occurs.

13. Dodge Dakota
Four-Door Pickup
SCORE: 117
Consumer Reports'accident avoidance: Average

First, the good: The mid-size Dakota is one of the least-tipsy pickups, with a four-star rollover rating, plus an "Average" accident avoidance rating. Now, the bad: It's rated "Acceptable" in front- and rear-impact tests, and there's no available stability control. Side airbags and side-curtain bags are optional.

14. Chevrolet Cobalt/Pontiac G5
Two-Door
SCORE: 117
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Much better than average (Cobalt SS)

The Chevy Cobalt and its almost identical twin, the Pontiac G5, are a little more dangerous than average due to their side-impact performance. The IIHS gave the Cobalt a "Poor" evaluation in its side-impact tests, and when NHTSA tested the Cobalt, they noted a safety concern over the higher-than-average likelihood of serious head trauma. Front-side airbags and side-curtain airbags are optional, but stability control is not available.

15. Nissan Xterra
Four-Door SUV
SCORE: 115
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The tall, boxy Xterra sport-utility vehicle flaunts its rugged looks toward active young men, and fortunately comes with stability control to help remedy its three-star NHTSA rollover rating and especially high rollover risk. Frontal impact results are passable but unspectacular, at four stars. Side and side-curtain airbags are optional.

16. Saturn ION
Four-Door
SCORE: 115
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Better than average

The ION shares its underpinnings with the Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5, but has some more substantial differences. For instance, the rollover index is slightly better. The ION gets a "Poor" rating from the IIHS in side-impact testing, along with a three-star NHTSA side-impact rating for front occupants. Head-protective side-curtain airbags are optional; stability control is not.

17. Chrysler PT Cruiser
Van
SCORE: 114
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Average

The very retro-stylish yet roomy PT Cruiser has been around for quite a few years essentially unchanged, with no major update during that time. NHTSA side-impact performance for front occupants is a modest four stars. Front-seat side airbags aren't standard on all Cruisers, but they're available at extra cost. Stability control isn't available at all.

18. Honda S2000
Convertible
SCORE: 114
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Much better than average

The high-performance S2000 convertible has stellar handling and accident avoidance, and gets a surprisingly good five-star rating in NHTSA's side-impact test, plus a top five-star mark for rollover risk. But side airbags aren't at all available on the little, low-riding roadster.

19. Toyota Scion tC
Two-Door
SCORE: 113
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Better than average

Like most small, sporty coupes, the tC boasts good handling--as evidenced by CR's "better than average" rating for accident avoidance and a relatively low risk of rollover. But side-impact airbags aren't standard and if not equipped with the optional side airbags and curtain bags, the tC can be a little risky. It received a just-acceptable, four-star side-impact rating,

20. Mazda3
Four-Door/Five-Door Hatchback
SCORE: 113
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Much better than average

The Mazda3 has been the darling of automotive critics. The styling is unique and still stands out several years after introduction, the powertrain is peppy, and it's one of the best-handling small cars. Now for the bad part: Both the sedan and hatchback versions of the 3 fared very poorly in side-impact crash tests, garnering a lowly three-star rating from NHTSA and the lowest "Poor" rating from the IIHS. Side airbags aren't standard, either.
(C)Forbes

Top 10 Sports Cars

Domestics top the list of the 10 most popular sports cars on MSN Autos for the first quarter of 2007. Led by the iconic Ford Mustang, the Chevrolet Corvette follows in second place while the new Saturn Sky takes the bronze.

For sports car enthusiasts, there may never be enough horsepower. Porsche gives its 911 a power boost with the addition of the GT3 and 911 Turbo, each packing substantially more than 400 horsepower. And for that added kick, Porsche has equipped the 911 Turbo with a button that can momentarily increase its maximum torque by 45 lb-ft to a neck-snapping 505 lb-ft.

Italian-made Lamborghini gives its "bullish" Murcielago a new designation—LP640—and adds 60 more horsepower to its already potent V12 engine for 2007.

Four domestics, three Japanese imports and three European imports make up the top ten list.

The list of the ten most popular sports cars on MSN Autos is based on visits to the site's vehicle research pages during months January through March of 2007.

1. Ford Mustang
The legendary American pony car has continued to be a hit after going retro a couple of years ago. Available in a coupe or convertible, the rear-wheel-drive Mustang has a starting price of under $20,000 with the base 210-horsepower V6 coupe. The high-performance GT version is equipped with a 4.6-liter 300-horsepower V8 which can run to 60 mph in just 5 seconds and to 100 mph in 12.5 seconds. An even more powerful version is available in the 500-horsepower supercharged Shelby GT500, the most powerful factory-produced Mustang ever built.

2. Chevrolet Corvette
Chevrolet's world-class high-performance sports car is now in its sixth generation and available in a coupe or convertible. For 2007 the Corvette adds steering-wheel-mounted audio controls with Bose premium audio systems and a larger glove compartment. A standard 6.0-liter 400-horsepower V8 engine delivers 400 lb-ft of torque at 4400 rpm, while the limited-edition Z06 has a 505 horsepower 7.0-liter V8 that produces 470 lb-ft of torque— the fastest production Corvette available. The Z06 also gets impressive fuel economy at an estimated 16 and 26 city/hwy mpg.

3. Saturn Sky
When the Sky debuted for the 2007 model year, no one would have guessed the aggressively styled roadster came from Saturn. The Sky and the Pontiac Solstice are siblings—sharing the same GM Kappa platform, engine, transmissions and other major components. The Sky has more contemporary styling and offers a softer ride than the Solstice. A high-performance version called the Sky Red Line is available featuring a turbocharged 260-horsepower 2.0-liter engine, dual exhaust with polished aluminum outlets and unique exterior and interior features.

4. Mitsubishi Eclipse
A redesigned Eclipse debuted for the 2006 model year with bold new styling, and adds a convertible version for 2007 called the Spyder. Also for 2007 the Eclipse adds a standard anti-theft system with hood switch, a Sun & Sound Package and seven new colors. The front-wheel-drive coupe is longer, wider, roomier and more powerful than its predecessor. Under the hood is a 2.4-liter 162-horsepower 4 cylinder in the GS and a 3.8-liter 263-horsepower V6 in the GT. The automatic cloth top in the Spyder folds completely out of sight in about 19 seconds.

5. Nissan 350Z
The Nissan 350Z received its first major update in the 2006 model year, which includes a revised exterior and an enhanced interior. A new Grand Touring Coupe featuring the 18-inch front/19-inch rear wheels, and front and rear spoilers were also added to the lineup. For 2007 the 350Z is updated with the next-generation VQ35HR engine that produces 306 horsepower and 268 lb-ft of torque, featuring a twin air intake system that helps reduce airflow resistance and increases horsepower. The front hood design and front-seat mounted side-impact supplemental airbags on the roadster are also new for the 2007 model year.

6. Porsche 911
Porsche gives its 911 lineup a power boost with the addition of the 911 Turbo and GT3 for 2007. The GT3 has a 415-horsepower 3.6-liter boxer 6-cylinder engine and comes standard with on-demand traction that's derived from Porsche's Carrera GT. The 911 Turbo features a twin-turbocharged 480-horsepower engine and a high-tech all-wheel-drive system. For 911 Turbos equipped with the optional Sports Chrono Package, pushing the Sport button allows the turbochargers to increase maximum pressure by 2.9 psi for up to 10 seconds, which increases the maximum torque by 45 lb-ft to a whopping 505 lb-ft.

7. Lamborghini Murcielago
This Italian exotic is always a favorite among MSN sports car enthusiasts. Originally named after a fighting bull, the Murcielago receives a new designation, a more aggressive look and more power for 2007. The Murcielago LP640—derived from the Italian description of the engine position (longitudinale posteriore) and horsepower output—is offered as a coupe and a roadster. Pushing the LP640 is a 640-horsepower 6.5-liter V12 engine that delivers 487 lb-ft of torque, which gets transmitted to the road via permanent all-wheel drive.

8. Mazda MX-5 Miata
The Mazda MX-5 Miata hit the U.S. market in 1989 and has become one of the top-selling two-seat convertibles in the world. An all-new third-generation Miata debuted for the 2006 model year with new styling, improved steering, suspension and brakes that make the roadster more fun to drive. For 2007 a power retractable hardtop is available for the first time, and offers the same amount of trunk capacity as the folding soft-top. Hardtop versions also receive chrome trim around the grille opening, bright headlight bezels, a chrome band in the door handles and a white-lens center high-mounted stop light.

9. Pontiac Solstice
One of the main rivals to the MX-5 Miata is the Pontiac Solstice. With a starting price around $22,000, the Solstice has a 2.4-liter dual overhead camshaft 4-cylinder engine that produces 177 horsepower. If that's not enough power to satisfy, a high-performance GXP version is available featuring a 2.0-liter Direct Injection Turbo with Variable Valve Timing in a DOHC 4-cylinder aluminum engine that produces 260 horsepower and 260 lb-ft of torque. The GXP is also styled differently with front and rear fascia extensions and high-polished stainless steel dual exhaust outlets.

10. Ferrari F430
The Ferrari F430 made its debut at the 2004 Paris Motor Show replacing the 360 Modena. Styled more aggressively than its predecessor, the Italian sports car was introduced for the 2005 model year. The F430 is powered by a 490-horsepower 4.3-liter V8 engine and mated to a 6-speed manual transmission, delivering 343 lb-ft of torque at 5250 rpm. Available in a Coupe or Spider, the F430 can reach 0 to 62 mph in 4.0 seconds and a top speed of over 196 mph, according to Ferrari.
(C)MSN

If you drink, you can't drive these Nissans

Beer-breaths, beware.

A new concept car with breathalyzer-like detection systems may provide even greater traction for Japanese efforts to keep impaired drivers off the road.

Nissan's alcohol-detection sensors check odor, sweat and driver awareness, issuing a voice alert from the navigation system and locking up the ignition if necessary.

Odor sensors on the driver and passenger seats read alcohol levels, while a detector in the gear-shift knob measures the perspiration of the driver's palm when starting the car.

Other carmakers with detection systems include Sweden's Volvo , which has developed technology in which drivers blow into a measuring unit in the seat belt before an engine can start.

But Nissan's car includes a mounted camera that monitors alertness by eye scan, ringing bells and issuing a voice message in Japanese or English if a driver should pull over and rest.

The car technology is still in development, but general manager Kazuhiro Doi says the combination of detection systems will ultimately keep an eye on who's behind the wheel.

"We've placed odor detectors and a sweat sensor on the gear shift, but for example if the gear-shift sensor was bypassed by a passenger using it instead of the driver, the facial recognition system would be used," said Doi.

Also keeping a short leash on drivers, car seat belts tighten if drowsiness is detected, while an on-road monitor checks if a car is keeping its lane properly.

Japan's No. 3 carmaker, which competes with Toyota and Honda, has no specific timetable for marketing, but aims to yoke all technology to cut the number of fatalities involving its vehicles to half 1995 levels by 2015.

Nissan's Doi says they still have to distill exactly what impairment means: "If you drink one beer, it's going to register, so we need to study what's the appropriate level for the system to activate."
(C)Reuters

Ten Cars You Can't Buy in the U.S.

The U.S. has restrictions when it comes to cars that can be purchased here, but it wasn't always that way.

She may be the land of plenty, but when it comes to purchasing certain cars, the U.S. falls short.

Wheels from French automakers Peugeot, Citroen and Renault aren't sold in the States. American buyers can't have Italian brands other than those of high-end makers Ferrari and Maserati. They also can't register many of Germany's new, diesel-powered passenger cars in five states, including New York and California, because of tough emissions rules.

It wasn't always that way.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, American buyers had a wide choice of French and Italian cars. They might not have been very reliable, but their styling, comfort, ride and handling added spice to the automotive melting pot.

Today that pot is rather bland. Peugeot, the last remaining French brand in the U.S. market, abruptly pulled the plug on its underperforming U.S. subsidiary in 1991, done in by high prices and poor quality, which made them unsuited for the market, especially in light of the new competition from Lexus and Infiniti from Japan.

Neither it nor other French brands has come back, even though by all accounts, their products are much improved. And Alfa Romeo and Fiat are long gone from the U.S. market.

When they left, the French and Italian brands were fat and lazy, with huge domestic market shares that were practically guaranteed by their home governments, which maintained high tariffs between European countries.

After 1992, the European Community ushered in a new era of freer competition that created a more even playing field for imported cars. Fiat, for instance, nearly went broke as its Italian market share fell, but in the long run the French and Italians hung on and have come back in Europe stronger than before. Today, they can afford to invest in a U.S. distribution channel, and their products are much more suitable for U.S. buyers, especially in terms of quality.

Take the Peugeot 4007 SUV. You would think at least some American buyers would like to buy it. Even though $3 gasoline has torpedoed U.S. demand for big domestic SUVs, import luxury-brand SUVs like Land Rover, the Porsche Cayenne and the Mercedes GL-Class have prospered.

Yet nobody expects Peugeot back anytime soon, nor sister company Citroen, which makes a distinct version of the 4007 called the C-Crosser. The closest American buyers can get is a Mitsubishi Outlander, which was developed in a three-way cooperative effort among the brands.

Italian Renaissance

Unlike the French makers, Italian brands Alfa Romeo and Fiat, which belong to parent company Fiat S.p.A., appear ready for a comeback.

Fiat quit selling cars in the U.S. under the Fiat brand in the mid-1980s; it had a poor quality reputation summed up by the acronym, "Fix It Again, Tony." (Fiat also owns the Maserati brand, which it relaunched in the U.S. market in 2002, after a 12-year absence.) Alfa Romeo quit in 1995, after a shaky alliance with then-Chrysler. The No. 1 Alfa dealer in the U.S. sold only 28 cars in 1994, according to Automotive News.

But Fiat Auto CEO Sergio Marchionne has said Alfa would return to the U.S. market, but not before the end of 2008. Alfa Romeo's mainstream models are the Brera Coupe and Spider convertible. The brand also has shown a high-end sports car, the 8C Competizione, at auto shows. And speculation persists on whether the company could export a higher-performance version of the tiny, redesigned Fiat 500 to the U.S. market. It would compete with the Mercedes Smart car and BMW's Mini brand.

Pump Busters

Modern diesels are an especially logical choice for a comeback, now that fuel efficiency is on the radars of U.S. consumers.

Fuel-efficient diesels dominate today's European market, and German automakers are preparing to launch a host of so-called "50-state" diesels sellable in the entire U.S. market, starting next year.

Thanks in part to low-sulfur diesel fuel mandated by the U.S. government since 2006, today's diesel engines are quiet, powerful and not smoky — unlike the diesels in the Peugeot 505 of the mid-1980s. And diesel engines get about 30 percent more miles to the gallon versus the same-size gasoline engine.

What does all this mean for you? If you’re a car enthusiast who likes choice, the list of cars you can’t buy in America might soon get shorter.

Alfa Romeo Spider V6 model
About $46,377

The 1967 movie The Graduate made the Alfa Romeo Spider a pop culture icon, but poor quality and financial problems for parent Fiat S.p.A knocked the brand out of the U.S. market in 1995. Several product generations later, the latest Spider could help launch a U.S. comeback in the next few years. In Europe, engine choices include a 260-hp 3.2-liter V6.


Aston Martin Vanquish S
About $360,000

The Vanquish S, last offered in the U.S. market for the 2006 model year, is Aston Martin's fastest-ever, street-legal car, with a hand-built, 6.0-liter V12 engine that generates 520hp. It is theoretically a four-seater, but European customers can replace the cramped rear seats with a luggage shelf. Ford Motor sold Aston Martin to a group of investors earlier this year.

Audi S3
About $39,700

The S3 is a high-performance version of the A3, which is available in the U.S. The S3 has a 265-hp, turbocharged, four-cylinder engine. However, the S3 has two strikes against it with U.S. buyers: It's a boxy two-door and it's a hatchback, which is not a popular body style. The A3 is a four-door, and looks like a station wagon.


BMW 1 Series
Estimated U.S. Starting Price: Around $30,000

Germany's BMW AG introduced the four-door hatchback 1 Series in the fall of 2004, but not for the U.S. market. America will get an all-new 1 Series coupe along with the rest of the world, starting in early 2008. The U.S. gets two six-cylinder variants, the 230-hp 128i and the 300-hp 135i. The European hatchback model has smaller engine options and diesel available.

Citroen C6
About $54,000

The Citroen C6 flagship sedan has a 3.0-liter, 215-hp V6 gasoline engine, or a choice of two diesels. Cool features include a head-up display for the driver. Also, to meet European safety standards for low-speed pedestrian impacts, the hood automatically raises slightly in case of an impact, to create a small "crumple zone" between the hood and hard points under the hood.

Fiat 500
About $14,000

Fiat launched the latest generation of the 500 minicar on July 4. In Europe, engine choices range from only 69 hp to 100 hp. But with the Mercedes smart brand set for a U.S. launch next year, and BMW's Mini brand doing well, the U.S. could be ready for a higher-performance version of the 500, if Fiat adds one in the next few years.


Smart (Mercedes) fortwo
Starting U.S. Price Under $12,000

Mercedes-Benz launched smart (small "s") in Europe in 1998. U.S. customers can finally buy one in early 2008. The base fourtwo has a three-cylinder engine and a five-speed automatic transmission that can be shifted manually--and not much else. Air conditioning, power windows and even a radio are optional. In an unusual setup, Penske Automotive Group, the nation's second-largest dealer chain, will distribute smart for Mercedes-Benz.

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
Estimated U.S. Price: Around $35,000

The high-performance "Evo" was last offered in the U.S. for the 2006 model year. Mitsubishi will revive it in early 2008. Features include all-wheel drive and a lightweight, turbocharged, four-cylinder engine, with an aluminum cylinder block.



Nissan Skyline
About $25,000

Since you can’t buy a new one in the U.S., some "drifters" in Southern California have bought used Japanese-market Skylines and paid to have them converted to meet U.S. regulations. Drifting is driving sideways, in a controlled skid. The closely related Infiniti G35 is the next best thing for U.S. buyers, but it is being replaced this fall by the all-new G37.


Peugeot 4007
Pricing Not Available

Peugeot, which bailed out of the U.S. market in 1991, says on its official Web site that it has "no plans" to return. If it ever did, maybe some U.S. buyers would like an attractively styled SUV like the 4007--especially if there were a more powerful alternative to the standard, four-cylinder diesel engine. The 4007 was expected to debut this month in Europe.
(C)Forbes

About Paying for Cars With Cash

There are two questions that greet every car buyer who walks into a showroom: “Are you ready to buy today?” and “How do you plan to pay?”

If the answer to the first is yes, there are smiles all around. If the answer to the second is cash, that warm greeting may grow chilly.

To be sure, no dealer will turn away a cash-paying customer, not in the atmosphere that surrounds the automobile industry these days, but all things considered, they are less welcome than buyers who want to lease or finance their cars. “We actually love all paying customers,” said George Borst, the chief executive of Toyota Financial, “but we really want people to finance.”

On the other hand, many car dealers are trying to clear out big inventories at the end of the 2007 model year to prepare for fresh models that begin arriving soon.

But buyers who pay cash, whether they write a check or borrow the money elsewhere and bring it to the showroom, provide car dealers with fewer opportunities to make money on a car deal.

That ranges from the cut they get from arranging a lease or loan, to options like extended warranties or antirust coating that buyers are more likely to choose if they can fold it into the amount they borrow. In some cases, those extras account for up to 75 percent of a showroom’s profits.

But, to some dealers’ chagrin, cash deals are up in 2007. Some 11.7 percent of buyers paid cash for cars in the first half of this year, versus about 8 percent over the last few years, according to a survey by CNW Marketing Research, which studies car buying habits.

In all, about 26 percent of buyers are bringing cash to the table, whether it is out of their bank accounts or in pre-arranged loans through their credit unions, banks or home lenders, according to the Power Information Network, the research arm of J. D. Power & Associates.

That overall figure is up slightly from last year, but still below the one-third of buyers who paid cash in the 1950s, when customers, many with lingering memories of the Great Depression, came to showrooms with their check books or stacks of bills.

It is in line, however, with the rate during the 1970s and 1980s, before car companies made widespread use of cut-rate loans and discount lease plans.

One big reason for the recent rise in cash-paying buyers is the introduction of small and less-expensive cars into the American market, like the Honda Fit, Toyota Yaris and Nissan Versa, said Art Spinella, the president of CNW Marketing.

Because many consumers purchase small vehicles as second and third cars, and have a car loan for their primary vehicle, a number are choosing instead to pay cash rather than take on another loan, Mr. Spinella said. That is particularly true for women buyers, who account for about 42 percent of cash-paying customers.

Cash-paying buyers, who tend to be wealthier than typical consumers, are often reaping investment profits. This year, 34.8 percent paid for their cars by selling stock, the most common source of cash, compared with 31.8 percent who took money out of their savings, Mr. Spinella’s data showed.

Indeed, at brands like Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Audi and BMW, as many as one-third of transactions are cash sales.

For these customers, sticker price can be no object. One shopper at Lexus of Ann Arbor, Mich., recently paid $116,000 in cash for the Lexus LS 460 Lh, the hybrid version of Lexus’s ultra luxury sedan, which went on sale in July.

Mark A. Louria, the general sales manager there, said about 25 percent of his customers paid cash for their new cars, keeping them for an average of six to seven years. Mr. Louria said he tried to encourage many customers to lease their cars instead, arguing that it was a better way to take advantage of ever-changing technology.

In the end, “it’s whatever works best for them,” Mr. Louria said.

Shopping sites like Edmunds.com, Cars.com, Kelly Blue Book (kbb.com) and Autobytel.com are places where consumers can research data like the invoice price, and the amount that manufacturers are giving to dealers in rebates and extra incentives.

Those who plunk down dollar bills often cite a single reason. “I just don’t like debt,” said Todd Larson of Shorewood, Minn. Mr. Larson and his wife, Linda, paid $33,000 cash for their 2005 Ford Freestyle, as well as a 2001 Jeep Cherokee.

For Matthew Galloghy, 30, who lives in Batavia, Ohio, outside Cincinnati, it is simply saving money. He recently paid about $20,000 for a Honda Accord, and plans to drive it for about 10 years.

Mr. Galloghy takes his thrift to another level. He said he would make a monthly deposit equal to a car payment, or about $300, in a money market account. “And now I certainly have a cushion for emergencies or anything else that may come up,” Mr. Galloghy said.

Cash purchases had all but died out in 1998, when buyers were snapping up cheap lease deals that allowed them to take home more expensive models, especially sport utility vehicles, for little down and minimal monthly payments.

After a rebound, they plummeted again in the months after the September 2001 attacks, when auto companies led by General Motors rolled out zero percent financing plans in an effort to spur auto sales.

Lately, these plans have been far more limited than they were earlier this decade, said Jesse Toprak, an analyst with Edmunds.com, a Web site that offers car-buying advice. Many automakers, who made zero percent financing available to virtually any customer six years ago, now offer it only to those with the best credit, he said.

Auto company finance arms and banks have been burned by oversetting these cars’ residual value, or the amount that they estimate the vehicle to be worth when the lease is finished. The higher the residual, the lower the monthly payment, but a too-high residual means the finance company takes a loss on the car after it is turned in.

These lenders also have been hurt by their practice of encouraging five and six-year car loans, which can lead to lower payments, but can result in a vehicle being worth less than the remaining amount to be paid off, a situation the industry calls “upside down.”

Zero-percent-financing plans, in which buyers need only pay for taxes, licenses and other documentation, can prove more beneficial to consumers with the best credit.

Likewise, a discounted lease of 36 months or less can allow trend-conscious customers to swap their cars for the next hot model without gambling on the car’s value, even though they will pay interest on the lease, transaction fees, and may need a down payment. No matter what, buyers need to haggle over the price first before discussing the details.

But some buyers simply want to own outright. In that case, these consumers need to do their homework before they begin negotiating, checking out the prices that are being paid in their area for the automobile they want on sites like Edmunds, which provides a tool it calls the “true market value.”

Buyers enter their ZIP codes, and then choose the options they want, and are provided with the price most frequently paid by purchasers in their area.

Without that knowledge, cash-paying customers risk not just a frosty dealer response, but a concerted effort to get them to change their minds, said Mr. Toprak, who sold cars early in his career.

“When I was at a closing and the customer said, ‘this is a cash deal,’ I knew I would not make any money for the next hour,” he said.

Mr. Toprak advised cash buyers to get prices from several dealers through their Web sites. If a sales person balks at honoring that figure because a customer wants to pay cash, the buyer can threaten to go elsewhere, he said.

Still, some buyers prefer to stick to their guns.

John Kealing, a St. Louis salesman, paid $34,000 cash for his 2006 Infiniti G35x, the second car this decade for which he has paid cash. Mr. Kealing said he deliberately waited until the last minute to tell the dealer that he was paying cash. “He found out when he put the loan document in front of me,” Mr. Kealing said.

The dealer “tried to talk me out of it, actually,” he said. “He told me he had some great rates, but I didn’t waver.”

Rob Butler, owner of the Butler Automotive Group in Indianapolis, said he doesn’t discourage customers who want to pay cash from doing so.

“If a guy likes to write a check, fine,” Mr. Butler said. “Cash is still cash.”
(C)NYT

Earthquake: Toyota getting back to normal

No. 1 carmaker, hit by supply problems following an earthquake last week, lost 55,000 units of vehicle production, but reaffirms its overall sales target for 2007.

Toyota Motor Corp. said it would resume work at two-thirds of its car assembly lines in Japan on Tuesday after an earthquake cut off supplies of key components to its factories, and it kept its global sales targets unchanged for 2007.

Auto production at Japanese carmakers has virtually ground to a halt after the country's top supplier of piston rings, Riken Corp., was hit by an earthquake on July 16.

Speaking at its annual mid-year news conference, Toyota President Katsuaki Watanabe said on Monday the automaker would lose about 55,000 units of vehicle output after a complete stoppage at all domestic plants through Monday and at 20 of the 31 assembly lines at its 12 group-wide car factories on Tuesday.

Plans for Wednesday and beyond would be decided on Tuesday.

But Watanabe stressed that shutting down factory production was not alarming under the circumstances, and defended Toyota's famed lean manufacturing method as one of its competitive strengths.

"We will gauge how to make up for the lost production in due time," Watanabe said. "What's important is being able to figure out how swiftly we can fix the problem and return to normal."

Car sales in Japan have declined across the board, but Toyota's domestic factories have been working at full speed to satisfy demand overseas. Toyota exports 60 percent of its Japan-made vehicles.

Watanabe conceded that the domestic market remained tough - Toyota's sales fell 10 percent in the first half of the year to 826,000 units - but said he was counting on new car launches and the Tokyo Motor Show in the latter half to jump-start sales.

"We realize that our domestic sales target of 1.72 million units (for 2007) is very challenging, but we've seen some improvement in July and we're not changing our global targets," he said.

Toyota in December set a parent-only sales goal of 8.4 million vehicles for 2007 and 9.34 million units for the group, including Daihatsu Motor Co. and Hino Motors Ltd. Both figures represent a 6 percent rise from 2006.

Margin goal
Toyota, which overtook General Motors Corp. as the world's biggest automaker last year, has been boosting its sales volume and profits steadily driven by its popular, fuel-efficient models such as the Camry and Prius sedans.

Management has set a goal of 10 percent operating profit margin, up from 9.3 percent in the business year ended March 31, and Watanabe said the automaker would keep that target for the mid to longer terms despite intensifying competition, the growing popularity of smaller, cheaper cars and the need to step up spending on developing environmental and safety technologies.

"I think it's a good target that (also) works for the mid to long term," he said.

Toyota already has the highest profit margin among the world's mass-volume carmakers. Domestic rivals Honda Motor Co. and Nissan Motor Co. had margins of 7.7 percent and 7.4 percent, respectively, last year.

As part of its safety activities, Toyota announced on Monday it would include side airbags and curtain shield airbags as standard equipment on all new passenger cars going forward.
(C)Reuters

New Nissan X-Trail

The customer is always right – that’s Nissan’s claim as it unveils its all-new X-Trail off-roader.

Bosses say owners of the outgoing car rated its styling so much that the firm has opted for an evolution­ary look on the second generation, which hits dealers on 1 September.

Based on the Qashqai platform, it’s 175mm longer than its predecessor, giving more room for passengers and luggage. The boot has grown by 193 litres to 603 litres, and now has a double deck floor.

Under the bonnet, buyers get a choice of petrol engines: a 139bhp 2.0-litre and a 166bhp 2.5. For the more economically minded, Nissan’s latest 2.0-litre dCi diesel is available with 148bhp or 170bhp, returning 39.8mpg and 38.2mpg respectively.

All cars get a six-speed manual gearbox as standard. A conventional six-ratio automatic is an option on the lower-powered diesel, while the larger-capacity petrol version can be specified with a CVT unit.

The new car comes in three trim levels: Trek, Sport and Aventura. All have electronically controlled 4WD, Bluetooth phone connect­ivity, alloys, climate control and ESP stability control. Prices range from £18,795 for the 2.0-litre petrol Trek to £26,720 for the 2.0 dCi Aventura auto.
(C)AutoExpress

Top 10 Off-Road Luxury SUVs

Ironically, some of the most luxurious and expensive SUVs are the best equipped for dirty off-road duty — not that most drivers will ever test these capabilities.

Even though most drivers would shudder at the thought, some of the priciest, most luxurious SUVs relish trouncing through mud, bounding over boulders and powering up steep inclines. Think of them as well-mannered brutes, frustrated for lack of opportunity to display their brawn.

As car buyers abandon truck-based SUVs for car-based ones — called “crossovers” by industry insiders — to gain more on-road comfort and capability, it’s the costlier truck-like models that continue to flaunt true rock-crawling abilities. (Click here to read about the difference between car- and truck-based SUVs.)

“This is the carryover from the idea that any ‘real’ SUV had to be able to get to the top of the mountain with its 4x4 system,” says George Peterson, president of AutoPacific Group, a California-based automotive research firm. In many ways, this makes a luxury SUV the vehicular equivalent of costly professional-quality stove and oven ranges sold to wealthy people who don’t cook much but would like to think they have the tools to whip up a gourmet meal if the need ever arises.

“Substantially less than 10 percent [of luxury SUV owners] indicate that they actually go off-roading,” says AutoPacific’s Peterson. “We actually think that the percentage that actually off-roads is less than 5 percent, but we have to go with what the owners report.”

While some lower-cost SUVs like the Jeep Wrangler and Nissan Xterra boast the largest percentage of “real” off-roader enthusiasts — Jeep says 60 to 80 percent of Wrangler owners take their vehicles to the trails — some large luxury models are equipped to tackle tough terrain. “The price of a Land Rover has always been higher than many other four-wheel-drive vehicles, based not just on luxury but on capability,” says Bob Burns, off-road events manager for Land Rover North America. “Range Rover customers want to buy the best and want to experience what their vehic